Welcome to the British Marine Aggregate Producers Association, English Heritage and Crown Estate Protocol web pages.
The offshore dredging industry provides around 20% of the aggregate needed for construction projects across the UK. Though all dredging areas are assessed for archaeological potential prior to the granting of the licence, industry staff are still highly likely to encounter archaeological finds during their day to day work.
BMAPA and EH put in place the Protocol, developed by Wessex Archaeology, in 2005 which advises industry staff on how to protect our submerged heritage. The Protocol states that all finds of archaeological interest should be reported using the Implementation Service run by Wessex Archaeology, which is now entering its 5th year. In October 2009 the Crown Estate confirmed that it will jointly fund implementation of the Protocol with BMAPA for the next three years.
Follow the links on the right hand side to learn more about the Protocol, the associated Awareness Programme and the wealth of discoveries that have been reported because of its implementation.
The Protocol was produced in response to a Guidance Note written by BMAPA and EH in 2003. The Guidance Note provides practical advice on assessing, evaluating, mitigating and monitoring the impact of marine aggregate dredging on submerged archaeology. It can be downloaded here.
Guidance Note April 2003 (PDF)
The Guidance Note was informed by previous studies into the impact of offshore dredging, most notably Wenban-Smith’s 2002 ‘Palaeolithic and Mesolithic Archaeology on the Seabed’ report. This included a series of maps characterising the known archaeological resource. The maps, and the original report, can be downloaded here.
Palaeolithic and Mesolithic Archaeology on the Seabed (PDF, 6.64MB)
Recorded casualties in the English Channel and North Sea (PDF, 431KB)
Charted hazards and destinations in the English Channel and the North Sea (PDF, 499KB)
Late Upper Palaeolithic and Mesolithic sites with contemporary coastlines in the English Channel and North Sea (PDF, 419KB)
The Protocol was prepared for BMAPA and EH by Wessex Archaeology and came into effect in August 2005. It applies to the wharves and vessels of all BMAPA companies so that if a find is discovered at a wharf, onboard vessel or on the seabed it can be reported to ensure that our submerged heritage is understood and protected.
Each wharf or vessel has a Site Champion, a single person who is responsible for reporting discoveries to a Nominated Contact within the company. The Nominated Contact uploads discoveries onto the secure web-based reporting system designed for this purpose. Wessex Archaeology staff are alerted to the presence of new discoveries and every find is investigated through the Implementation Service.
Download a copy of the protocol (PDF)
The Protocol recommends that every find discovered during aggregate dredging is reported through an Implementation Service run by Wessex Archaeology.
Wessex Archaeology investigate every find that has been reported with the support and advice of a wealth of specialists, both within Wessex Archaeology and across the country. This information is collated into a series of reports – one for the wharf or vessel that made the discovery, one for English Heritage, BMAPA, The Crown Estate, Local Government Archaeological Officers and Portable Antiquities Scheme Officers and a third report is generated for the Receiver of Wreck when necessary. Any other agency that may have an interest in dredged remains, for example the Ministry of Defence, will also be informed and all finds are uploaded onto this website as an RSS feed.
Wessex Archaeology staff will advise directly on finds that are obviously isolated and uncontentious. Discoveries that may indicate the presence of a larger site of archaeological interest or importance are referred directly to English Heritage who has the power to implement temporary or permanent exclusion zones around archaeological remains in order to protect them.
The way in which finds are reported allows our submerged heritage to be understood and this information, gained because of the diligence of BMAPA staff, has become an important resource for informing other offshore projects.
The annual reports from the last three years of the Implementation Service are available to download or view online.
Examples of the kinds of finds made by the marine aggregate industry, which were reported prior to formal introduction of the Protocol, are shown on the pages linked on the right.
In July 1999 a roughly spherical stone with a hole through it was recovered from the reject stone pile at CEMEX’s Leamouth Wharf in Southampton. The wharf is used for processing aggregate from off the Isle of Wight, but it was not possible to establish its position on the seabed more precisely.
The stone was reported to, and later delivered to Wessex Archaeology, where it was described and photographed.
The stone is Greensand, which outcrops at the coast at Swanage in Dorset, Eastbourne in Sussex, Folkestone in Kent, and on the Isle of Wight. Upper Greensand outcrops at Culver Cliff and around Ventnor on the Isle of Wight.
The stone is about 170mm by 230mm, and the hole is about 15mm in diameter and extends right through the centre of the stone. Although the surface of the stone is abraded, there are no obvious toolmarks. Both the spherical shape and the hole could be the result of human handiwork, though it is conceivable that the stone is entirely natural in origin.
On balance, the stone seems to have been fashioned from a block, possibly to serve as a weight for a fishing net, line or lobster pot. Alternatively, it may have been a naturally shaped stone selected opportunistically for such a purpose. A third alternative is that the stone is both natural in origin, and came to be on the seabed through natural processes.
Even if the object was fashioned, selected and/or deposited by people, there is no way of gauging when this might have happened.
The attentiveness of the staff at Leamouth Wharf, and the willingness of CEMEX to seek archaeological advice, helped to show that a voluntary, industry-based reporting protocol could be effective.
Stone with hole. Photograph © Wessex Archaeology.
In 2002, UMA reported a collection of animal remains found off East Anglia. Wessex Archaeology sought advice from the Natural History Museum, initially on the basis of photographs and then by sending the remains to be examined. The remains were identified as follows:
an upper molar from a small woolly mammoth (Mammuthus primigenius);
a fragment of mammoth tusk;
a fragment of scapula (shoulder bone), also probably from a mammoth;
a tine (point) from a red deer (Cervus elaphus) antler;
part of a whale vertebra.
The red deer antler was from quite a large individual, but the mammoth remains are all from quite small individuals. The mammoth molar is most typical of Middle Devensian populations, and mammoth and red deer occur together in some stages of the Middle Devensian, when individual red deer can be extremely large.
A mid Devensian date would fit with the suspected date of the aggregates being dredged, but the whale vertebra is a puzzle as the area would have been dry land at the time the aggregates were laid down.
Tusk
Mammoth's Tooth
Red deer tine.
Whale vertebra
Photographs © Wessex Archaeology.
In February 2003, UMA reported an animal jaw fragment found on the rejects pile at its Erith wharf and thought to have come from aggregates dredged off the east coast. The fragment was sent to the Natural History Museum, where it was identified as belonging to an extinct giant deer, most likely Megaloceros giganteus or one of its immediate ancestors. The fragment was of the bottom left jaw. The teeth were considered to be small for later Pleistocene examples of the species, but matched specimens from several Middle Pleistocene contexts.
It looked as though the fragment was originally buried in fine grained sediment but had been eroded and deposited into coarser sediment. The fragment had been quite heavily mineralised before being abraded and marked in the course of reworking.
Although giant deer remains are known from dredging in the North Sea, they are less commonly found than other large mammal fossils.
Photo of jaw fragment. Photograph courtesy of UMA.
In December 2004, UMA recovered four cannonballs and two pins from aggregates dredged to the west of the Isle of Wight.
Two sizes of shot were apparent, interpreted from photographs as being from a 6-8 pounder and from a much smaller gun (such as a swivel gun) respectively. The ‘pins’ appeared to be relatively small iron fastenings, probably from a ship’s structure or fittings. As they had been found together, it was thought likely that they indicated the presence of a wreck in the vicinity. Only a broad date range, from the fifteenth to the nineteenth century, could be offered.
UMA and Hanson (who were engaged in joint dredging of the area) reviewed recent sidescan data from the area where the aggregate had been dredged, but did not see any obvious trace of a wreck. Nevertheless, they established a 1km by 250m exclusion zone and commissioned a high resolution geophysical survey.
The results of the geophysical survey, which included both sidescan and magnetometer data, were passed to WA for review. The review confirmed that there was no clear trace of a wreck in the survey area. The only features of any note were a series of areas of what appear to be boulders. These seemed most likely to be natural in origin (rather than ballast from a wreck), but might have served to trap items of wreckage that would otherwise have been dispersed. The large exclusion zone was removed, but a smaller one put in place over the boulders, as a precautionary measure.
Photograph of the cannonballs. Photograph courtesy of UMA.
In May 2005, Hanson Aggregates Marine reported a metal object found on a dredger off Great Yarmouth. The best interpretation that WA were able to offer for the object was that it was the remains of an explosive harpoon, as used for whaling from the mid-nineteenth century. The object looks like part of the ‘knuckle’ of such a harpoon, which lies behind the explosive tip and houses the harpoon’s barbs. It is not clear why such a find would be made off Great Yarmouth.
Harpoon Photograph courtesy of Hanson Aggregates Marine.
In 2005 two pieces of aircraft wreckage were spotted on board the Hanson Aggregates Marine dredger ‘Arco Dart’ within sand and gravel dredged off the coast of Worthing, Sussex. The parts were kept on board the vessel for over a year before being passed to WA staff during a site visit as part of the Awareness Programme.
The RAF museum at Duxford was able to match a serial number identified on one of the two parts to a rear wing spar from a plane developed by Supermarine at the end of the Second World War, the Spiteful, an intended replacement for the Spitfire. However, very few of this type of plane were manufactured after the design was rejected by the RAF in favour of the new jet powered Gloster Meteor and de Havilland Vampire.
Supermarine’s first attempt at a jet powered fighter, the Attacker, kept the same wing as the Spiteful and, although the design was rejected by the RAF, 143 were built for the Royal Navy. The Attacker entered service as the first jet fighter of the Fleet Air Arm and several were lost at sea.
The most likely match for the parts found on the Arco Dart is the Attacker WP275 which crashed into the sea on the 6th July 1956 after taking off from Royal Naval Air Station Ford, in Sussex when the wing tip folded and the pilot ejected. The pilot, Sub-Lieutenant J. F. Yeates of the Royal Naval Volunteer Reserve, survived unharmed.
Crashed aircraft are important to archaeologists because in many cases they offer a unique form of evidence for the historic development of flight. If surviving examples of a particular type of craft do exist they are often only the later models of a particular type or they have been heavily refurbished. Moreover, all crashed military aircraft are protected by law under the Protection of Military Remains Act 1986. The discovery of aircraft remains is thus incredibly important, particularly as aircraft crash sites may contain human remains.
Pieces of wreckage recovered from the site
The Awareness Programme which supports the Protocol Implementation Service was launched in 2006. So far it has produced 3 issues of the popular Dredged Up newsletter, visited wharves and vessels, here and on the continent, and hosted 3 regional workshops.
English Heritage has renewed funding for the Programme, through the ALSF, until 2011. This funding extension will allow Wessex Archaeology to:
Visit and revisit wharves and vessels in Britain and on the continent to raise awareness of archaeology and the Protocol.
Host 2 further workshops for industry and heritage staff on the recognition of finds and their potential importance.
Publish 5 additional copies of the popular Dredged Up newsletter.
Previous Awareness projects have been incredibly successful and the 2009-2011 Awareness Programme will build on this foundation. Reports outlining previous Awareness Programme work can be downloaded here.
As part of the Awareness Programme we offer advice to wharves and vessels which is supported by a series of handouts. These include advice on reporting, conservation, concretions and ordnance. The handouts have been revised and redesigned for 2009 and can be viewed or downloaded here (PDF link at the bottom of the page).
Protocol for the reporting finds of archaeological interest - Handouts 2009
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| Download the BMAPA protocol handout, including advice on reporting, conservation, concretions and ordnance (PDF). | 666.88 KB |
Subscribe to the discoveries by RSS
This item was discovered by M. Morley amongst material dredged from licence area 240, which lies in the East Coast region. It is not the first rigging block to be recovered from this region as similar finds were dredged from area 240 in 2009. This block consists of a degraded wooden casing housing a metal sheave wheel. This would have held rope and was likely to have formed part of the rigging of a vessel. Photographs of this object were sent to Nigel Nayling, a timber specialist at the University of Wales Lampeter, who confirmed the identification of the object made on the vessel. The pulley is likely to have come from a boat and may be part of a wreck, though may also have been discarded or lost over board. The presence of metal in the construction of the pulley block indicates that it is nineteenth century or younger in date as prior to this, blocks were made entirely of wood.
![]()
This item was discovered by Malcolm O’Neill on board the Arco Humber. It was dredged from licence area 106C which is in the Humber region, 19km east of Mabelthorpe. The find was sent to Michael Simms, a fossil expert at the National Museum of Northern Ireland, who took it to a meeting of the Belfast Geologists’ Society. Staff from the University College Dublin took a thin shaving of the rock in order to examine it under a microscope. This revealed crystals of plagioclase feldspar and weathered olivine. This rock is an igneous rock – probably basalt or dolerite - and it is not native to the Humber region - the nearest sources of this type of igneous material are Northumberland and Scandinavia. The presence of this find in the Humber region is likely to be the result of glacial action during a past ice age.
This find was discovered by Martin Keeble amongst material dredged from Area 360, which lies in the East Coast region. It dates from the Palaeolithic or earlier. Images of the find were sent to Andy Currant, Curator of Mammal Remains at the Natural History Museum who identified it as an elephant’s atlas. Currently it is not known what species of elephant yielded this atlas. Andy tells us that whilst all mammoths are elephants, not all elephants are mammoths. So it could have come from a mammoth such as the Woolly mammoth, the Southern mammoth or the Steppe mammoth, all of which inhabited Britain at some point in the past, or it could have come from an elephant.
![]()
This Red Ensign was dredged from licence area 351 which lies to the east of the Isle of Wight. It was amongst cargo dredged by the Britannia Beaver which was delivered to Dover Wharf. The flag was discovered by CEMEX’s Richard Cork and reported by Geoff Bucknell. This find is believed to be relatively modern. Ken Reginald, Fleet Marine Manager at CEMEX, identified that this is a current Ensign from a British registered vessel and that the fixings on it are standard for flags of this type from modern vessels. Images of this find were sent to Richard Noyce at the Royal Naval Museum, who confirmed this view, and to Angela Karsten, marine conservator for English Heritage. Angela indicated that it was likely that this flag had become buried on the seabed sometime after it was lost. This would account for the dirt on it when found and for the relatively good level of preservation. As for how long it had been buried, it is not possible to determine at the moment. It was found to the east of the Isle of Wight which sees a lot of marine traffic and it is plausible that it was lost by one of the many merchant vessels that use this popular sea route.
Dereck Brown found these artefacts on board the Sand Falcon on September 1, 2009. The Falcon had been working in Area 360 in the East Coast dredging region, 20km east of Lowestoft, Suffolk. These finds were sent to Andy Currant who is the curator of mammal remains at the Natural History Museum in London. Andy compared the CEMEX tooth to one in the Museum’s collections and believes that the dredged find originates from Mammuthus meridionalis, the so-called “Southern Mammoth”. Although this tooth has suffered some damage, it does not appear to have been rolled by the sea. It is possible then that this tooth lay undisturbed for hundreds of thousands of years before its discovery on the Falcon. The antler fragment likewise shows no signs of rolling and the breaks are very fresh, as though it has also been plucked from an in situ deposit. It is difficult to identify given the small size of the fragment but Andy felt that, given its thickness, it could come from Megaloceros, the giant deer. These two finds represent some of the oldest to ever be reported through the Protocol and they are particularly significant as they appear to have lain undisturbed for many thousands of years. The staff of the Falcon are commended for recognising and retrieving these finds on board the vessel and all future finds from this area will be reported and carefully studied.
This artefact was discovered by J Keeble at CEMEX’s Angerstein Wharf after having been dredged from Area 319, which lies East of Lowestoft, by the Sand Falcon. It was shown to Wessex Archaeology’s Zooarchaeologist, Jessica Grimm, who identified it as being a left metatarsus of a large deer, possibly a Red Deer. Whilst it may have washed from a terrestrial context, it is likely that this example dates from a time when areas of the North Sea were dry. This last occurred during the Palaeolithic when, between approximately 70,000 and 12,000 years ago, Ice Age conditions locked water into ice sheets. Several highly significant Palaeolithic or Old Stone Age finds have been dredged from the North Sea in recent times and every new find, such as this one, enhances our understanding of this enigmatic time period.
![]()
This item was discovered by Martin Keeble at CEMEX’s Angerstein Wharf amongst material from Area 137 which lies to the west of the Isle of Wight. This discovery was correctly identified by wharf staff as being part of the airframe of an aircraft. Wessex Archaeology sought the advice of the Royal Air Force Museum who confirmed that it appeared to be a distorted panel or the cowling from an aircraft. The circular hole seen on the find was designed to hold a Dzus panel fastener. Dzus fasteners, named after creator William Dzus, are used to secure panels that must be removed regularly or quickly onto equipment. They were invented in the 1930’s and are common on aircraft. Identifying exactly what type of aircraft this find came from is difficult without further information. However, comparison with aircraft in the museum’s collection revelead that this piece is similar to those seen on Spitfires and Typhoons. Records of WW2 plane losses at sea are highly incomplete and no planes are known to lie in Area 137. This could therefore be the first sign of a new site of archaeological significance.
![]()
This find was discovered by C. Woolcott at CEMEX’s Northfleet Wharf amongst material from Area 319, in the East Coast Region.This find was correctly identified by wharf staff as part of a tusk or horn. Images were sent to Wessex Archaeology’s zooarchaeologist Jessica Grimm who confirmed that, based on the flaking seen on the back of the find, it was likely to be tusk. This view was also confirmed by Andy Currant at the Natural History Museum. It is not possible to determine from this picture what species it belongs to, though it is likely that this find represents part of a mammoth tusk.
Click the review year to read online, or use the PDF link to save a copy to your computer.
View the Dredged Up From The Past newsletter archive.
The Full text of the Protocol can be downloaded here:
Shortened texts, serving as notes for Site Champions on Vessels and Wharves, can be downloaded here:
Aggregate industry staff will be able to find the name and contact details of their Site Champion on a poster which is being displayed on every BMAPA wharf and vessel. A copy of the Poster can be downloaded here:
Protocol - for reporting finds of archaeological interest 2008-9
Wessex Archaeology has produced four issues of the popular bi-annual Dredged Up newsletter as part of the ALSF funded Awareness Programme which supports the Protocol. Dredged Up explores the Protocol and the discoveries reported through the implementation service, and is widely distributed to BMAPA staff, heritage professionals and the general public.
View the newsletters online:
Download the newsletters (PDF):