Marine Aggregate Industry Protocol for the Reporting of Finds of Archaeological Interest

The Crown EstateBMAPA

 

 

Welcome to the British Marine Aggregate Producers AssociationEnglish Heritage and Crown Estate Protocol web pages.

The offshore dredging industry provides around 20% of the aggregate needed for construction projects across the UK. Though all dredging areas are assessed for archaeological potential prior to the granting of the licence, industry staff are still highly likely to encounter archaeological finds during their day to day work.

BMAPA and EH put in place the Protocol, developed by Wessex Archaeology, in 2005 which advises industry staff on how to protect our submerged heritage. The Protocol states that all finds of archaeological interest should be reported using the Implementation Service run by Wessex Archaeology, which is now entering its 5th year. In October 2009 the Crown Estate confirmed that it will jointly fund implementation of the Protocol with BMAPA for the next three years.

Follow the links on the right hand side to learn more about the Protocol, the associated Awareness Programme and the wealth of discoveries that have been reported because of its implementation.

Marine Aggregate Dredging and the Historic Environment: Guidance Note

The Protocol was produced in response to a Guidance Note written by BMAPA and EH in 2003. The Guidance Note provides practical advice on assessing, evaluating, mitigating and monitoring the impact of marine aggregate dredging on submerged archaeology. It can be downloaded here.

The Guidance Note was informed by previous studies into the impact of offshore dredging, most notably Wenban-Smith’s 2002 ‘Palaeolithic and Mesolithic Archaeology on the Seabed’ report. This included a series of maps characterising the known archaeological resource. The maps, and the original report, can be downloaded here.

Protocol for Reporting Finds of Archaeological Interest

The Protocol was prepared for BMAPA and EH by Wessex Archaeology and came into effect in August 2005. It applies to the wharves and vessels of all BMAPA companies so that if a find is discovered at a wharf, onboard vessel or on the seabed it can be reported to ensure that our submerged heritage is understood and protected.

Each wharf or vessel has a Site Champion, a single person who is responsible for reporting discoveries to a Nominated Contact within the company. The Nominated Contact uploads discoveries onto the secure web-based reporting system designed for this purpose. Wessex Archaeology staff are alerted to the presence of new discoveries and every find is investigated through the Implementation Service.

Protocol Download

Download a copy of the protocol (PDF)

 

 

Protocol Implementation Service

The Protocol recommends that every find discovered during aggregate dredging is reported through an Implementation Service run by Wessex Archaeology.

Wessex Archaeology investigate every find that has been reported with the support and advice of a wealth of specialists, both within Wessex Archaeology and across the country.  This information is collated into a series of reports – one for the wharf or vessel that made the discovery, one for English Heritage, BMAPA, The Crown Estate, Local Government Archaeological Officers and Portable Antiquities Scheme Officers and a third report is generated for the Receiver of Wreck when necessary. Any other agency that may have an interest in dredged remains, for example the Ministry of Defence, will also be informed and all finds are uploaded onto this website as an RSS feed.

Wessex Archaeology staff will advise directly on finds that are obviously isolated and uncontentious. Discoveries that may indicate the presence of a larger site of archaeological interest or importance are referred directly to English Heritage who has the power to implement temporary or permanent exclusion zones around archaeological remains in order to protect them.

The way in which finds are reported allows our submerged heritage to be understood and this information, gained because of the diligence of BMAPA staff, has become an important resource for informing other offshore projects.

The annual reports from the last three years of the Implementation Service are available to download or view online.

Pre Protocol Discoveries

Examples of the kinds of finds made by the marine aggregate industry, which were reported prior to formal introduction of the Protocol, are shown on the pages linked on the right.

The stone with the hole (1999)

In July 1999 a roughly spherical stone with a hole through it was recovered from the reject stone pile at CEMEX’s Leamouth Wharf in Southampton. The wharf is used for processing aggregate from off the Isle of Wight, but it was not possible to establish its position on the seabed more precisely.

The stone was reported to, and later delivered to Wessex Archaeology, where it was described and photographed.

The stone is Greensand, which outcrops at the coast at Swanage in Dorset, Eastbourne in Sussex, Folkestone in Kent, and on the Isle of Wight. Upper Greensand outcrops at Culver Cliff and around Ventnor on the Isle of Wight.

The stone is about 170mm by 230mm, and the hole is about 15mm in diameter and extends right through the centre of the stone. Although the surface of the stone is abraded, there are no obvious toolmarks. Both the spherical shape and the hole could be the result of human handiwork, though it is conceivable that the stone is entirely natural in origin.

On balance, the stone seems to have been fashioned from a block, possibly to serve as a weight for a fishing net, line or lobster pot. Alternatively, it may have been a naturally shaped stone selected opportunistically for such a purpose. A third alternative is that the stone is both natural in origin, and came to be on the seabed through natural processes.

Even if the object was fashioned, selected and/or deposited by people, there is no way of gauging when this might have happened.

The attentiveness of the staff at Leamouth Wharf, and the willingness of CEMEX to seek archaeological advice, helped to show that a voluntary, industry-based reporting protocol could be effective.

Stone with hole. Photograph © Wessex Archaeology.Stone with hole. Photograph © Wessex Archaeology.

Tusks and teeth (2002)

In 2002, UMA reported a collection of animal remains found off East Anglia. Wessex Archaeology sought advice from the Natural History Museum, initially on the basis of photographs and then by sending the remains to be examined. The remains were identified as follows:

  • an upper molar from a small woolly mammoth (Mammuthus primigenius);

  • a fragment of mammoth tusk;

  • a fragment of scapula (shoulder bone), also probably from a mammoth;

  • a tine (point) from a red deer (Cervus elaphus) antler;

  • part of a whale vertebra.

The red deer antler was from quite a large individual, but the mammoth remains are all from quite small individuals. The mammoth molar is most typical of Middle Devensian populations, and mammoth and red deer occur together in some stages of the Middle Devensian, when individual red deer can be extremely large.

A mid Devensian date would fit with the suspected date of the aggregates being dredged, but the whale vertebra is a puzzle as the area would have been dry land at the time the aggregates were laid down.

TuskTusk

Mammoth's ToothMammoth's Tooth

Red deer tine.Red deer tine.

Whale vertebraWhale vertebra

Photographs © Wessex Archaeology.

Animal jaw (2003)

In February 2003, UMA reported an animal jaw fragment found on the rejects pile at its Erith wharf and thought to have come from aggregates dredged off the east coast. The fragment was sent to the Natural History Museum, where it was identified as belonging to an extinct giant deer, most likely Megaloceros giganteus or one of its immediate ancestors. The fragment was of the bottom left jaw. The teeth were considered to be small for later Pleistocene examples of the species, but matched specimens from several Middle Pleistocene contexts.

It looked as though the fragment was originally buried in fine grained sediment but had been eroded and deposited into coarser sediment. The fragment had been quite heavily mineralised before being abraded and marked in the course of reworking.

Although giant deer remains are known from dredging in the North Sea, they are less commonly found than other large mammal fossils.

Photo of jaw fragment. Photograph courtesy of UMA.Photo of jaw fragment. Photograph courtesy of UMA.

Cannonballs (2004)

In December 2004, UMA recovered four cannonballs and two pins from aggregates dredged to the west of the Isle of Wight.

Two sizes of shot were apparent, interpreted from photographs as being from a 6-8 pounder and from a much smaller gun (such as a swivel gun) respectively. The ‘pins’ appeared to be relatively small iron fastenings, probably from a ship’s structure or fittings. As they had been found together, it was thought likely that they indicated the presence of a wreck in the vicinity. Only a broad date range, from the fifteenth to the nineteenth century, could be offered.

UMA and Hanson (who were engaged in joint dredging of the area) reviewed recent sidescan data from the area where the aggregate had been dredged, but did not see any obvious trace of a wreck. Nevertheless, they established a 1km by 250m exclusion zone and commissioned a high resolution geophysical survey.

The results of the geophysical survey, which included both sidescan and magnetometer data, were passed to WA for review. The review confirmed that there was no clear trace of a wreck in the survey area. The only features of any note were a series of areas of what appear to be boulders. These seemed most likely to be natural in origin (rather than ballast from a wreck), but might have served to trap items of wreckage that would otherwise have been dispersed. The large exclusion zone was removed, but a smaller one put in place over the boulders, as a precautionary measure.

Photograph of the cannonballs. Photograph courtesy of UMA.Photograph of the cannonballs. Photograph courtesy of UMA.

Harpoon (2005)

In May 2005, Hanson Aggregates Marine reported a metal object found on a dredger off Great Yarmouth. The best interpretation that WA were able to offer for the object was that it was the remains of an explosive harpoon, as used for whaling from the mid-nineteenth century. The object looks like part of the ‘knuckle’ of such a harpoon, which lies behind the explosive tip and houses the harpoon’s barbs. It is not clear why such a find would be made off Great Yarmouth.

Harpoon Photograph courtesy of Hanson Aggregates Marine.Harpoon Photograph courtesy of Hanson Aggregates Marine.

Supermarine Attacker (2006)

Fleet Air Arm Jet Fighter

Aircraft wreckage dredged up by the ‘Arco Dart’ has been identified as the remains of a Supermarine Attacker, the first jet fighter deployed by the Royal Navy.

In 2005 two pieces of aircraft wreckage were spotted on board the Hanson Aggregates Marine dredger ‘Arco Dart’ within sand and gravel dredged off the coast of Worthing, Sussex. The parts were kept on board the vessel for over a year before being passed to WA staff during a site visit as part of the Awareness Programme.

The RAF museum at Duxford was able to match a serial number identified on one of the two parts to a rear wing spar from a plane developed by Supermarine at the end of the Second World War, the Spiteful, an intended replacement for the Spitfire. However, very few of this type of plane were manufactured after the design was rejected by the RAF in favour of the new jet powered Gloster Meteor and de Havilland Vampire.

Supermarine’s first attempt at a jet powered fighter, the Attacker, kept the same wing as the Spiteful and, although the design was rejected by the RAF, 143 were built for the Royal Navy. The Attacker entered service as the first jet fighter of the Fleet Air Arm and several were lost at sea.

The most likely match for the parts found on the Arco Dart is the Attacker WP275 which crashed into the sea on the 6th July 1956 after taking off from Royal Naval Air Station Ford, in Sussex when the wing tip folded and the pilot ejected. The pilot, Sub-Lieutenant J. F. Yeates of the Royal Naval Volunteer Reserve, survived unharmed.

Crashed aircraft are important to archaeologists because in many cases they offer a unique form of evidence for the historic development of flight. If surviving examples of a particular type of craft do exist they are often only the later models of a particular type or they have been heavily refurbished. Moreover, all crashed military aircraft are protected by law under the Protection of Military Remains Act 1986. The discovery of aircraft remains is thus incredibly important, particularly as aircraft crash sites may contain human remains.

Pieces of wreckage recovered from the sitePieces of wreckage recovered from the site

Protocol Awareness Programme

The Awareness Programme which supports the Protocol Implementation Service was launched in 2006. So far it has produced 3 issues of the popular Dredged Up newsletter, visited wharves and vessels, here and on the continent, and hosted 3 regional workshops.

English Heritage has renewed funding for the Programme, through the ALSF, until 2011. This funding extension will allow Wessex Archaeology to:

Previous Awareness projects have been incredibly successful and the 2009-2011 Awareness Programme will build on this foundation. Reports outlining previous Awareness Programme work can be downloaded here.

As part of the Awareness Programme we offer advice to wharves and vessels which is supported by a series of handouts. These include advice on reporting, conservation, concretions and ordnance. The handouts have been revised and redesigned for 2009 and can be viewed or downloaded here (PDF link at the bottom of the page).

Protocol for the reporting finds of archaeological interest - Handouts 2009

Publish at Scribd or explore others: Business How-To Guides & DIY protocol bmapa

 

AttachmentSize
Download the BMAPA protocol handout, including advice on reporting, conservation, concretions and ordnance (PDF).666.88 KB

Protocol Archaeological Discoveries

RSS logo Subscribe to the discoveries by RSS

  • Tarmac_0292 and Tarmac_0293: Silver Tableware

    Tarmac_0292 and Tarmac_0293: Silver Tableware

    In September 2009 Justin Apps, Richard Apps and Chris Fryer found a collection of tableware at Ridham wharf. The next month Justin also found a spoon bearing the same crest and hallmark as the earlier finds. These are believed to have come from licence Area 254 which lies in the East Coast region, east of Great Yarmouth. This assemblage consists of fragments of two goblets, one of which bears a crest, three hallmarked spoons, two burnt candle holders and one candle holder displaying classical style faces. Also found were a twisted piece of metal that may represent the base of a goblet or candlestick, or may have been affixed to a wall or other item, and an enigmatic bowl-shaped item, similar to a candle snuffer, that is yet to be identified. Two of the candlesticks appear to have suffered heat damage and it is plausible that this occurred when the items became deposited in the sea. These finds are potentially highly significant. The nature of the items – all tableware, some bearing hallmarks, some bearing a crest or coat of arms – indicates that these are a unique assemblage. There are very few scenarios that would introduce an assemblage like this to the seabed and the most plausible, given the location of their discovery, is that they were lost with a ship. Wessex Archaeology’s Finds Specialist Lorraine Mepham identified from the hallmark that the finds were assayed in 1781 in London. Images of the crest were sent to the Royal College of Arms who identified it as belonging to the Dalrymple family, Earls of Stair. The presence of the Viscount’s coronet plus the hallmark indicates that these are the Arms of John Dalrymple, 6th Earl of Stair (1749-1821). John Dalrymple was well travelled during his lifetime. He was a captain in the 87th foot regiment and served during revolutionary war in America present at successful attacks on New London and Fort Griswold in 1781. On his return to Britain he was appointed minister-plenipotentiary or diplomat to Poland then Prussia. He succeeded his father as 6th Earl of Stair in 1789 and sat as a Scottish representative peer from 1790-1807 and from 1820 until his death. He died, unmarried, on 1 June 1821, at his house in London and was buried in the vault at Inch, Wigtownshire (1). Although John Dalrymple was not lost at sea with his tableware it could have been lost en route or return to Poland or Prussia during his work as a diplomat 1782-87 perhaps as part of a shipwreck carrying his belongings. It is clear at this stage that these finds are some of the most significant to ever be reported through the Protocol and Tarmac staff should be commended for the way they have reported and protected these finds. Source: (1) Abbott, DM. 2004-10 Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Oxford University Press

  • Tarmac_0317: Fishing Weight and Fossil

    Tarmac_0317: Fishing Weight and Fossil

    These stone items were discovered by at Bedhampton Wharf by G. Cooper. They were dredged by the City of Winchester from licence area 395/1, which lies off the east coast of the Isle of Wight. Photographs of the two finds were shown to Wessex Archaeology’s finds specialist, Lorraine Mepham, who identified them as a stone fishing weight and a natural fossil. Finding a fishing weight is interesting from an archaeological point of view because the location of such a find can tell us where people were fishing and information about their diet. Fishing is known to have occurred around Britain since early prehistoric times. Some of the earliest discoveries of artefacts have been made by English Heritage of fish traps on the Isle of Wight coast. Fishing weights may have been used in an inshore environment or have been used further out at sea on fishing gear deployed from vessels. Although the weight has been worked by human agency there is no way of gauging their age, as such items were used from the prehistoric to the post-medieval periods. The stone fossil had interesting striations, resembling rope marks, which required expert clarification that it was in fact a natural object and had not been used by people in some manner. It is thought that it is fossilised sea coral or possibly a distorted ammonite. While this is not an archaeological find, it is important that any discoveries of unusual shape or fabric continue to be reported through the Protocol, as they may prove to be a significant archaeological discovery.

  • CEMEX_0301: Roman Pottery

    CEMEX_0301: Roman Pottery

    This find was discovered on board Sand Fulmar by N Coombs. It was dredged from licence area 107, which lies approximately 14 miles east of Chapel St Leonards, Lincolnshire. This find was shown to Wessex Archaeology’s pottery specialist, Rachael Seager Smith who identified the sherd as part of a type of pottery vessel known as a mortarium – a large bowl with a rim adapted for gripping and often provided with a spout. Grit embedded in the inner surface of these vessels suggests that they were used for the mixing, grinding and pulverisation of food – rather like a pestle and mortar or an ancient version of the electric food processor! This pottery vessel is made from a coarse, gritty sandy fabric. Its surfaces are much worn and almost all traces of the internal grits have been lost but the overhanging rim (shown right) still provides a very good grip for the fingers. It is probable that its surfaces were originally much more orange in colour, and may even have been coated in a thin white slip. It was around 28cms in diameter and would probably have been between 10-15cms high. The style of this bowl suggests that it was made and used during the 2nd to 3rd centuries AD (roughly AD 150 – 250). Mortaria were never common in East Anglia and no pottery vessels exactly comparable to this one have been found on land, but it is likely that it was made somewhere in the region, perhaps in Norfolk, where small numbers of locally-made, greyish mortaria have been found on sites such as Caistor-on-Sea, Brampton, Brundall, Wighton and Hindringham, for example. Given the considerable trade along the east coast to the northern frontier, it is possible that this vessel was lost overboard by local East Anglian traders, although it could even mark the position of a Roman wreck. Other recent Roman Pottery finds include two sherds of Samian Ware discovered in 2008 at Kwinte Bank, Belgium; these two pieces had identical stamps suggesting they were from the same cargo and could indicate the presence of a shipwreck. Few finds of sea going Roman ships are known in northern Europe, so reporting finds such as these could lead to an important discovery.

  • Tarmac_0316: Anchor Fluke

    Tarmac_0316: Anchor Fluke

    This artefact was found by Tarmac staff onboard the City of London while working off Great Yarmouth in July 2010. Images were sent to Wessex Archaeology’s maritime archaeologist, Graham Scott, who determined that it was part of a wrought iron anchor with one fluke and no shank. This example measures around 100cm long, with a fluke that is 24cm long. In the image it looks to be a single thin arm, however it is in fact the full length of both arms to the bills. The shank seems to have broken off at the crown and one of the arms has lost its fluke. Because of the degraded nature of the object it is not possible to determine exactly what type of anchor it is or its age. However, with the information available, it is most likely to be a small stocked anchor dating anywhere from the Middle Ages to the 19th century, possibly originating from a small fishing vessel.

  • TARMAC_0309: Animal Vertebra

    TARMAC_0309: Animal Vertebra

    This animal bone was discovered at Burnley Wharf by NC Sait. It was dredged by Arco Dee from licence area 124/1A, which lies approximately 11miles SSW of Worthing. This animal bone is approximately 115mm long. Photographs of this find were shown to Wessex Archaeology’s Zooarchaeologist, Lorrain Higbee, who thinks it is likely to a cattle cervical vertebra, or neck bone. It is possible that it is from an Aurochs, the ancestor of modern cattle. The aurochs is an extinct ancestor of domestic cattle although they were much larger with a shoulder height of around 2 metres. Aurochs originated in India, migrating west to Europe around 250,000 years ago. Several highly significant Palaeolithic or Old Stone Age finds have been dredged from the North Sea in recent times and flint artefacts and faunal remains have been found of the South Coast so every new find, such as this one, enhances our understanding of this period.

  • Brett_0303: Aircraft Remains

    Brett_0303: Aircraft Remains

    These finds were discovered at Brett’s Cliffe Wharf by Ashley Wilkinson. They were dredged from licence area 351 which lies to the east of the Isle of Wight in April 2010. One of the pieces was identified by Andy Simpson at the RAF Museum as part of an engine from an aircraft. It has not been possible on current evidence to identify what type of plane it is from. There are many aircraft downed in the South Coast region, a high percentage of which date to the Second World War. There are no recorded aircraft losses in the region of Area 351 but that is not suprising given the difficulties of keeping accurate loss records in a marine context. All further finds from this region will be closely monitored.

  • CEMEX_0307: Animal Bone

    CEMEX_0307: Animal Bone

    This animal bone was discovered at Angerstein wharf by L. Medhurst. It was dredged by Sand Falcon from licence area 251, which lies east of Lowestoft. The animal bone is approximately 30cm long. Photographs of this find were shown to Wessex Archaeology’s Zooarchaeologist, Lorrain Higbee, who thinks it is likely to be an ungulate metatarsal or foot bone from an Aurochs, the ancestor of modern cattle, although much larger with a shoulder height of around 2 metres. Aurochs originated in India, migrating west to Europe around 250,000 years ago. This species is now extinct and the last recorded aurochs died in Poland in 1627.

  • CEMEX_0299: Fossilised Animal Bone

    CEMEX_0299: Fossilised Animal Bone

    This fossilised bone was found by N. Coombs on board the Sand Fulmar. It had been dredged from licence area 447 which lies in the Thames region, South of Felixstowe. Images of this find were sent to Andy Currant, Curator of Mammals at the Natural History Museum, and he confirmed that it is an animal bone. The bone is a humerus, or upper limb bone, which would have extended from the shoulder to the knee joint. Judging which species it originates from is very hard from photographs alone but given the extent of fossilisation on the bone (which can be seen by its dark colour) and its size, it is possible that it originates from a mammoth.

  • CEMEX_0300: Shoe Sole

    CEMEX_0300: Shoe Sole

    This find was discovered on board the Sand Fulmar by N. Coombs. It was dredged from licence Area 107 which lies in the Humber dredging region. This find was correctly identified by staff on the Fulmar as being the leather sole of a shoe. The shape of the item, as well as the regular stitching around the edges confirm this and this find represents the central part of the shoe. Wessex Archaeology staff studied the find but have not been able to assign a date to it. Soles began being manufactured separately, as this one has been, and sewn on from around the 17th century and today the soles of many shoes are glued on rather than sewn. The regular stitching on this item suggests that it has been manufactured using a machine. Machines capable of stitching the soles to the uppers of shoes were first invented in the mid-1850’s but it was a long time before they were used universally. Based on the evidence above, find CEMEX_0300 is currently thought to have been manufactured at some point within the last 50 years. However, this is speculative and further finds from area 107 may help to identify not only the age of this find, but also how it came to be submerged.

  • CEMEX_0290: Aircraft Fragments

    CEMEX_0290: Aircraft Fragments

    These pieces of aircraft were found at Angerstein Wharf by J. Keeble, after being dredged by the Sand Fulmar. They were found amongst material from licence area 251, which lies in the East Coast dredging region, east of Lowestoft. Images were sent to the Imperial War Museum where Andy Robinson studied the colour of the paint and the shape of the items to reveal that they originate from United States Air Force – USAF. Images of the finds were then sent to Brett Stolle, an expert working at the United States Air Force Museum, who recognised them as having come from a McDonnell-Douglas F-4 Phantom. This type of aircraft was flown from the mid-1960’s and they are still in use today around the world.

  • CEMEX_0302: Shark Tooth

    CEMEX_0302: Shark Tooth

    This fossilised tooth was found on board the Sand Fulmar by N. Coombs. It was amongst material dredged from licence area 473 East which lies in the East English Channel region, south of Eastbourne, Sussex. Images of this find were sent to the Natural History Museum where they were shown to Oliver Crimmen, Senior Fish Curator, who identified it as a shark’s tooth. The most likely species for the origin of this find is an ancient species of Carcharias taurus, or sand tiger shark. They are not found in British waters today but can be found in coastal water around Australia, the Mediterranean, Africa, Asia and the east coasts of North and South America. CEMEX_0302 is a fossilised example so it is likely to have come from a shark that lived millions of years ago. Similar teeth have been discovered in Kent and are believed to date to the Eocene epoch – some 50 million years ago.

  • Kendalls_0298: Sword Hilt

    Kendalls_0298: Sword Hilt

    This sword hilt was found by P. Stevens amongst material dredged from South Coast licence area 351, which is located approximately 20km east of Ventnor, on the Isle of Wight. This find was correctly identified by Kendalls staff as being a sword hilt featuring a lion. Images of the hilt were sent to the Royal Armouries Museum where James Hester, Curatorial Assistant for Edged Weapons , found two possible parallels in the Museum’s collections. One was a British Bandsman’s sword dating from 1854, the other a French Marine’s short sword dating from 1820. It is not possible at this stage to determine which country produced the dredged example, though we may be able to determine this based on future finds that come from licence area 351.

Documents

Protocol Implementation Service Documents

Guidance

Reports and Reviews

Click the review year to read online, or use the PDF link to save a copy to your computer.

Newsletters

View the Dredged Up From The Past newsletter archive.

Other Documents

The Full text of the Protocol can be downloaded here:

Shortened texts, serving as notes for Site Champions on Vessels and Wharves, can be downloaded here:

Aggregate industry staff will be able to find the name and contact details of their Site Champion on a poster which is being displayed on every BMAPA wharf and vessel. A copy of the Poster can be downloaded here:

 

Latest Document

Protocol - for reporting finds of archaeological interest 2008-9

Dredged Up from the Past

Newsletters

Wessex Archaeology produces the popular bi-annual Dredged Up newsletter as part of the ALSF funded Awareness Programme which supports the Protocol. Dredged Up explores the Protocol and the discoveries reported through the implementation service, and is widely distributed to BMAPA staff, heritage professionals and the general public.

View the newsletters online:

Download the newsletters (PDF):